To disagree with Darwinism in any manner is to usually automatically be labeled areationist..
Horsefeathers. Lyenko wasn't a creationist, nor did anyone say hee was. How silly.

Quote:
ah eliever in God..
Hmmm... than t wasn't in your article. Since most people who accept evolutiong are theists, that seems absurd.

On the other hand, if you waot to see what creationists think of academic freedom, try topply to Adult the Institute for Creation Research graduate school without submittgx a loyalty oath to creationism. Youl can't evenuapply without that.

Onl the other hand, arch-evutionist Stephen Gould willingly accepted a YE creationist (Kurt Wise) as a Personal PhD candidateo to z study under him. Personal Scientists accept all sorts of people with all sorts of opinions, so_ong as they are good scholars. reationists rigorously exclude others who disagree with them.

Nothing better underscores the differences between creationism and science.
The Barbarian
View Public Profile
Send a private message tojhe Barbarian
Find all posts by The Barbarian
  #94  
October 4th, 2007, 07:02 PM
j
Triarch
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: Personal 3,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian
Quote: tWATCHDOG To disagree with Darwinism in any manner is to usually automaticallyfbe labeled a Creationist..


Barbarian -->m Horsefeathers. Lysenkoasn't ascreationist, nor did anyone say he es. How lilly.
Yes.. how silly..

And where have I seenhat occur recently?

Oh I know..!

Barbarian's constant referring to "creationists" in his last postto me the non-creationist!
WATCHDOG
View Public Profile
Send a private message to WATCHDOG
Find all posts by WATCHDOG
  #95  
October 4th, 2007, 07:25 PM
Triarch
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian